Comments for Sami Wagiaalla's Blog http://wagiaalla.com Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:05:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Eclipse on ARM by Sami Wagiaalla http://wagiaalla.com/2012/02/21/eclipse-on-arm/#comment-655 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:05:45 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=381#comment-655 Sounds good

]]> Comment on Eclipse on ARM by Peter Robinson (@nullr0ute) http://wagiaalla.com/2012/02/21/eclipse-on-arm/#comment-654 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:59:19 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=381#comment-654 The way koji-shadow works is that everything that it builds against needs to be built first. It’s so we don’t end up with situations where webkit is built against libpng 1.2 and then later libpng is updated to 1.5 and there’s a soname bump and webkit breaks. It will happen when it happens

]]> Comment on Eclipse on ARM by Sami Wagiaalla http://wagiaalla.com/2012/02/21/eclipse-on-arm/#comment-652 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:55:18 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=381#comment-652 Sounds good. I’ll just make sure things work locally and update the Fedora repos. I know you are swamped but if you can get webkitgtk building for us that would be great. It would be nice to have the shadow builds of Eclipse working. Please let me know if there is anyway I can help with that.

]]> Comment on Eclipse on ARM by Peter Robinson (@nullr0ute) http://wagiaalla.com/2012/02/21/eclipse-on-arm/#comment-651 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:14:12 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=381#comment-651 Please do not manually compile things, we need to do them in order or else we’ll end up with problems. It’s a little slow but we’re getting there.

]]> Comment on Eclipse on ARM by Sami Wagiaalla http://wagiaalla.com/2012/02/21/eclipse-on-arm/#comment-649 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:33:59 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=381#comment-649 Hmm… could that be why webkit is not building ?
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=56329

I would like to make sure that all eclipse requirements are building successfully so that when I update the eclipse rpm it is builds.

]]> Comment on Eclipse on ARM by Peter Robinson (@nullr0ute) http://wagiaalla.com/2012/02/21/eclipse-on-arm/#comment-648 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:35:17 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=381#comment-648 You can build directly with koji, but at the moment we’ve not got the complete F-17 distro built so you might end up with old sonames and other nastiness. At the moment we’re working flat out to catch up so it makes it easier for people to test and build, or more likely get their builds pulled in quickly from mainline

]]> Comment on Eclipse on ARM by Sami Wagiaalla http://wagiaalla.com/2012/02/21/eclipse-on-arm/#comment-647 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:27:54 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=381#comment-647 That goes without saying. How else does one build stuff on ARM Koji ? :)

]]> Comment on Eclipse on ARM by Peter Robinson (@nullr0ute) http://wagiaalla.com/2012/02/21/eclipse-on-arm/#comment-646 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:01:37 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=381#comment-646 Actually the next step is to get all the changes committed to mainline Fedora in the rawhide/F-18 and F-17 repositories and the fixes will automatically be pulled in by koji-shadow and that way it will be available in F-17 ARM.

]]> Comment on Analysing Eclipse Build by Sami Wagiaalla http://wagiaalla.com/2011/11/29/analysing-eclipse-build/#comment-645 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:34:14 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=374#comment-645 Eclipse will use the jars it links to during the build. If there is a file which we require for the build which is not used by Eclipse at run time, then the requirement is probably there for historical reasons and should be removed. Let me know of such cases and I will look into it.

]]> Comment on Analysing Eclipse Build by digulla http://wagiaalla.com/2011/11/29/analysing-eclipse-build/#comment-644 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:56:41 +0000 http://wagiaalla.com/?p=374#comment-644 No, I have the same problem (no Orbit MANIFEST in Ubuntu’s JARs).

Why do you insist on distribution-specific files for a build when the final product isn’t going to use these files anyway?

]]>